Advanced Search
Rail unions and campaigners to lobby Parliament over McNulty Rail Review threat to jobs, services an


Rail unions and campaigners to lobby Parliament over McNulty Rail Review threat to jobs, services and fares


Save our Railways: Rally and Lobby of Parliament

RAIL UNIONS will join up with passenger groups and community supporters for a mass rally and lobby of Parliament on Tuesday - 25th October - as part of the national campaign to stop the Government from implementing the recommendations of the McNulty Rail Review.

The Government was expected to respond formally to McNulty this month. There is a suspicion that it may have been delayed due to the moving of former Transport Secretary Phillip Hammond to defence in the wake of the Liam Fox scandal but unions are keeping up the campaigning pressure regardless.

McNulty's core proposals include:

  • Axing more than 600 ticket offices, de-staffing stations and turning the network into a criminals paradise.
  • Throwing guards off all trains and compromising safety and security on services right across the country
  • Jacking up fares, offering train operators even longer 'gold-plated' franchises and even more opportunity to mug the travelling public
  • Cutting maintenance and lining up infra-structure for a return to the lethal cocktail of conditions under Railtrack that led to Hatfield and Potters Bar.
  • Ignoring the cheap and efficient option of returning the railways to public ownership and instead repeating and compounding all the failures of rail privatisation.

RMT General Secretary Bob Crow said: 'McNulty represents the biggest threat to our railways since privatisation. Staff and passengers have a common interest in resisting an attack that would wipe out safety-critical jobs, de-staff trains and stations and jack up fares in the name of private profit. We all have a stake in stopping this carve-up dead in its tracks.'

Manuel Cortes, Assistant General Secretary TSSA said: "The McNulty proposals will worsen passenger services, turn some rail stations into no go areas and hit taxpayers in the pocket as a consequence of adding to the already rising unemployment queues. They make no sense and are driven by political dogma."

ASLEF general secretary Keith Norman said: 'If the McNulty proposals are implemented the railways will become the 'rich man's toy' that Philip Hammond predicted. Speculators will benefit at the expense of the travelling public, tax-payers and staff.'

Frances O'Grady, TUC Deputy General Secretary said: 'With rail passengers being hit by price hikes and public subsidy increasing, the escalating costs of our dysfunctional privatised rail industry must be addressed. The government has a clear choice. It can follow Europe with more efficient and cheaper rail systems under public ownership. Or it can follow the the McNulty report, cutting jobs and services, increasing the break-up of our rail network, and giving more power to private train operating companies.

"If the government follows McNulty, our railways will be even more skewed towards the interests of shareholders. With three quarters of franchises up for renewal in the next five years, bringing rail services in-house would be a painless process. Europe shows us that integrated, publicly-owned railways eliminate the massive costs and inefficiency of the privatised rail market where shareholders, consultants, executives and lawyers are the winners.

"The choice is simple. We urge the government to put the interests of taxpayers and passengers first and put an end to the disastrous privatisation experiment on our railways."

Further information: Geoff Martin or 07831 465 103 or 0207 255 9146

Derek Kotz on 07939 595 092 or 020 7529 8803


Early day motion 2299 - with cross-party support


McDonnell, JhonRussal, Bob

That this House is concerned that the proposals of the Government-commissioned McNulty review of the railways will worsen passenger services through the loss of thousands of frontline workers from trains, stations, ticket offices and safety-critical infrastructure and operational roles; is further concerned that the review proposals for greater commercial freedom for train operating companies will result in higher fares, cuts in services and more crowded trains; believes that proposals to break up Network Rail will increase the complexity and inefficiency of the railways, and ignores lessons from railways in European countries which have generally achieved lower costs and fares through a more unified structure; and urges the Government to use its forthcoming rail White Paper to deliver an expanding railway system, with affordable fares and proper staffing levels, operated as a public service which puts the needs of passengers, the economy, manufacturing and the environment before commercial considerations.

Delicious Digg Facebook Fark MySpace
Views: 804 views    Report Inappropriate Content
All Articles